{
"error_code": "SCHEDULE_CONFLICT",
"message": "Cannot publish schedule due to overlapping agent assignments in timezone America/Chicago.",
"details": "Agent ID 849201 has conflicting shift preferences during the validation phase of the weekly publish cycle."
}
The weekly schedule publication process is failing consistently at the validation stage when using the POST /api/v2/wfm/schedules/{scheduleId}/publish endpoint. The environment is Genesys Cloud US-1, running on the latest WFM service version. The specific issue arises when attempting to publish a schedule that includes approved shift swaps between two agents who share the same skill group but have different shift preference configurations. Both agents have submitted swap requests via the Agent Self-Service portal, and the requests were approved by the supervisor. However, when the publish API is triggered, the system returns a 409 Conflict error, citing an overlap in agent assignments. This is puzzling because the swap requests were validated individually and the total hours for each agent remain within the configured labor budget. The error log points to a conflict in the agent_assignments array, specifically where the start_time and end_time fields intersect with another assignment that should have been cleared by the swap. The timezone is set to America/Chicago, and all timestamps are in UTC. I have verified that there are no other pending schedule changes or bulk imports running concurrently. The issue persists even after clearing the cache and retrying the publish with a reduced set of agents. The goal is to ensure that shift swaps are correctly reflected in the published schedule without manual intervention. The current workaround involves manually adjusting the shifts in the UI, which defeats the purpose of the automated publish process. The API response does not provide enough detail to pinpoint which specific assignment is causing the conflict. Is there a known issue with the WFM engine handling swap approvals in the publish pipeline? Are there any additional parameters or headers required to bypass the strict validation check for swap-related conflicts? The team needs a reliable way to publish schedules that include approved swaps without encountering this recurring 409 error.