Does anyone know why predictive routing attributes are lagging behind in our bulk export jobs?
Context:
We are handling a complex legal discovery request involving digital channel interactions that were routed via predictive routing. The requirement is strict: we need the chain of custody to include the specific queue configuration and routing criteria used at the exact moment of contact assignment. This is crucial for proving that the agent was qualified for the interaction under our compliance standards.
We are using the GET /api/v2/recordings/bulkexport endpoint to pull transcripts and metadata. The environment is EU1. The issue arises when we cross-reference the routing_data embedded in the recording JSON with the GET /api/v2/routing/queues/{queueId} endpoint. For a significant subset of records (approx 15%), the routing_criteria object in the recording metadata shows a legacy skill set, whereas the current queue configuration shows the updated skill set. The timestamps on the recording indicate the interaction occurred after the queue update was deployed.
We suspect a synchronization delay between the routing service and the recording service metadata storage. However, the discrepancy persists even when we force a new bulk export job 24 hours after the interaction. The S3 integration is working fine; the 403 errors we saw previously are resolved. The problem is purely data integrity. The media_type is digital (specifically webchat). The SDK version we are using for the script is genesys-cloud-py 2.1.0.
Question:
Is there a known delay in how predictive routing metadata is baked into the recording object for digital channels? Or is this a bug where the recording service captures the queue state at the time of the export job initiation rather than the time of the interaction? We need to ensure the exported JSON reflects the historical state accurately for legal hold purposes. Any insights on forcing a refresh or fetching the historical routing config via API would be appreciated.