Looking for advice on a specific 409 Conflict error occurring within our Agent Scripting API integrations. This issue manifests exclusively when voice interactions undergo a mid-session carrier failover across our 15 BYOC trunks in the APAC region. The primary carrier occasionally drops SIP packets, triggering our failover logic to route traffic to secondary trunks. While the voice path stabilizes, the scripting context appears to desynchronize, resulting in API failures when attempting to update interaction attributes or execute subsequent script nodes.
The environment details are as follows:
- Genesys Cloud Release: 2024-08
- BYOC Trunks: 15 across Singapore, Sydney, and Tokyo
- SDK Version: Java SDK 15.6.0
- Architect Flow: Uses Set Interaction Attributes and Data Action nodes post-transfer
Steps to reproduce the issue:
- Initiate an outbound call via a dialer campaign configured to use the primary BYOC trunk in Singapore.
- Simulate a SIP registration timeout or packet loss on the primary carrier to trigger failover to the secondary trunk in Sydney.
- Once the call is connected and the agent accepts it, the Architect flow proceeds to the ‘Update Interaction Metadata’ node.
- The flow attempts to push custom attributes (e.g.,
carrier_failover_event: true) via the Agent Scripting API endpoint/v2/analytics/interactions/query. - The API returns a 409 Conflict error with the message: ‘Interaction context mismatch. Expected carrier ID does not match current routing profile.’
This behavior is inconsistent with standard failover scenarios where the interaction ID remains stable. The error suggests that the scripting engine is locking onto the original carrier’s context ID, which becomes invalid after the SIP re-registration on the secondary trunk. We have verified that the SIP credentials and outbound routing policies are correctly configured for failover. The issue does not occur when the call remains on the primary trunk.
Has anyone encountered similar context synchronization issues during BYOC failover events? Are there specific headers or parameters required in the Agent Scripting API call to refresh the carrier context dynamically? Any insights into the underlying SIP signaling state machine that might explain this lock would be greatly appreciated. We are currently bypassing the script node to avoid blocking the agent workflow, but this results in incomplete data capture for our analytics reporting.