Why does this setting in the Genesys Cloud Architect Data Action treat a standard HTTP 202 Accepted from the ServiceNow REST API as a failure, halting the flow execution? The integration logic expects asynchronous processing for ticket creation, yet the platform retries the request immediately upon receiving the 202 code instead of proceeding to the next node.
The ServiceNow endpoint returns the expected JSON payload with the sys_id, but the Architect flow logs a generic connection error and aborts. This behavior contradicts the documentation stating that 2xx responses should be considered successful unless explicitly mapped otherwise. Need to know if there is a specific configuration in the Data Action to accept 202 as a success state without triggering the retry mechanism.
You need to configure the Data Action to explicitly accept HTTP 202 as a successful response code. The default validation logic often treats non-200 OK codes as failures, causing the immediate retry loop. Verify that the “Success Status Codes” list in the action settings includes 202. This prevents unnecessary flow halts during asynchronous ServiceNow ticket creation.
As far as I remember, the issue isn’t just about adding 202 to the success codes. When running high-concurrency load tests, the Architect flow often times out waiting for a synchronous 200 OK if the downstream system (ServiceNow) is designed for async processing. The previous suggestion about updating the success status codes is correct, but it misses a critical configuration for load stability.
In my recent stress tests with 500 concurrent agents, I found that simply allowing 202 isn’t enough if the timeout is too short. The Data Action needs explicit timeout adjustments to handle the async gap. Here is the configuration that stabilized our flows:
Setting
Value
Reason
Success Status Codes
200, 202
Accepts async acceptance
Connection Timeout
5000 ms
Prevents immediate drop
Read Timeout
10000 ms
Allows SN to process
Retry Policy
None
Prevents duplicate tickets
Make sure the “Continue on Error” is set to false for the initial request, but if you are simulating peak load, consider wrapping the Data Action in a Try-Catch block. This prevents the entire flow from failing if ServiceNow returns a 503 due to their own load limits. During my JMeter simulations, we saw that without the extended read timeout, the Genesys Cloud platform would mark the action as failed before ServiceNow even acknowledged the payload.
Also, verify that the ServiceNow endpoint is not returning a 202 with an empty body. Genesys Cloud sometimes fails to parse empty responses even with the correct status code. Adding a minimal JSON payload like {"status": "accepted"} to the 202 response in ServiceNow helped resolve parsing errors in our Architect logs. This approach reduced our error rate from 15% to under 1% during peak simulation hours.
glad to hear you got past the initial 202 loop. i’ve seen this exact behavior in Architect where the platform treats any non-200 as a transient failure unless explicitly told otherwise. the “Success Status Codes” fix is the right first step, but there’s a hidden trap if you’re not careful with the timeout settings.
when ServiceNow returns a 202, it’s often doing a quick handshake before kicking off the heavy lifting. if your Architect action has a standard 30-second timeout, you might be fine. but if the SN instance is under load, that 202 might come back fast, yet the actual ticket creation hangs. Architect will mark the action as “success” because of the 202, but the downstream data might not be ready for the next step.
here’s what i do in my lambda handlers when bridging GC to external systems, and the same logic applies to your Architect config:
Explicitly define success codes: Add 200, 201, 202 to the success status list. Don’t just add 202. keep 200 and 201 there too in case SN switches behavior during upgrades.
Adjust the timeout: Set the action timeout to at least 45 seconds. if you’re creating complex tickets with attachments, you might need 60. the default is too aggressive for async handshakes.
Handle the payload carefully: the JSON payload in the 202 response usually contains a sys_id. make sure you’re mapping that correctly in the “Response” tab of the action. if the mapping fails, the flow breaks silently.
Add a retry policy: even with 202 accepted, network glitches happen. set a retry count of 2 with a 5-second backoff. it’s better to retry a successful 202 than to drop a ticket because of a transient timeout.
one thing to watch out for: if you’re using the ServiceNow OOTB integration in GC, it handles some of this automatically. but if you’re building a custom REST action, you’re on your own. i usually add a CloudWatch alarm on my lambda if the SN endpoint starts returning 500s, so i can pause the GC flow before it floods SN with retries.
check your flow logs. if you see the 202 being logged as “Success” but the next node fails, it’s likely a data mapping issue. double-check the JSON path.
the docs confirm 202 needs explicit whitelisting, which fixed the retry loop. adding 202 to the success codes list in the data action settings worked perfectly.